We’ll acknowledge upfront that our verdict is entirely subjective, laced with bias, and may be wrong. Some people will read this and think we’ve got it completely backwards, and those people are welcome to be incorrect in peace.
Right then. Let’s get into it.
The Looks
Sydney wins this one and it isn’t close. The Harbour, the Opera House, Bondi Beach, the bridge you can actually climb for reasons that remain slightly baffling – the city is objectively, almost unfairly beautiful. It was built around one of the world’s great natural harbours, and it knows it. Melbourne, meanwhile, is a handsome enough city of Victorian architecture, grand boulevards and the Yarra River, which does its best. If Sydney is the one who shows up to the party looking like that, Melbourne is the one with the better conversation. Both have their place.The Weather
Here things get complicated. Sydney gets more annual rainfall than Melbourne, which surprises most people, but Sydney’s rain tends to arrive as dramatic bucketing downpours rather than the grey persistent drizzle Melbourne specialises in. Sydney also gets considerably more sunshine, and its winters are the kind of mild that people in genuine winter countries find mildly offensive. Melbourne, by contrast, is famous for its “four seasons in one day” weather, a phrase Melburnians deploy with curious pride, as though meteorological chaos is something to boast about. You can leave the house in Melbourne in a t-shirt and return in a survival situation. Sydney: point.The Culture
This is where Melbourne makes its case, loudly and at length. The laneways stuffed with cafes, galleries and street art. The live music scene. The Australian Open. The Melbourne Cup, which is literally a public holiday. More AFL teams than you can shake a Sherrin at. The fashion. The festivals. Theatre productions that open in Melbourne before Sydney, a fact Melburnians mention whenever possible. Sydney has the Opera House and a very good art gallery, and culturally it punches well above its weight, but Melbourne wears culture like a second skin. Melbourne: point.The Coffee
Melbourne has been insufferable about its coffee for decades, and the maddening thing is that it’s entirely justified. The city essentially invented the flat white and has been refining the concept ever since. Sydney has improved dramatically and has excellent coffee if you know where to look, but Melbourne treats a bad cup as a civic offence. This one goes to Melbourne, and Melbourne knew it would before we even started.The Sport
Both cities are sports-obsessed in that specifically Australian way that suggests sport is not merely entertainment but a matter of civic survival. The split runs along football codes: Melbourne invented Australian Rules and has ten of the eighteen AFL teams; Sydney is rugby league territory, home of the NRL. The two cities have never made much effort to adopt each other’s code, which tells you something about the depth of feeling involved. Beyond football, Melbourne has the Boxing Day Test, the Australian Open, the Melbourne Cup, Formula 1 and the MCG, the largest stadium in the country. Sydney has the harbour for sailing and beaches for everything else. We’ll call this a draw and watch both sides object.The Cost of Living
Sydney is more expensive. Significantly more expensive. Housing is the main culprit: median house prices in Sydney run roughly $650,000 higher than in Melbourne, and rents tell a similar story. A couple renting in Sydney and commuting to work will spend somewhere in the region of $700 a month more than the same couple in Melbourne. Sydney’s toll roads are their own special misery. Melbourne has the Free Tram Zone, which lets you move around the entire city centre without paying a cent, and the tram network itself is one of the largest outside Europe. For anyone considering a move rather than a visit, this matters enormously. Melbourne: point.The Verdict
Sydney is more beautiful, Melbourne is more interesting. Sydney has the beaches, Melbourne has the culture. Sydney is pricier, Melbourne is more liveable by most measurable definitions – indeed, the Economist Intelligence Unit spent much of the 2010s giving Melbourne its “World’s Most Liveable City” award until Vienna and Copenhagen eventually muscled in. Sydney, meanwhile, has been named the world’s best city by Condé Nast Traveler eight consecutive times, which tells you something about who each city is pitching to.Our call? Melbourne, by a nose. The coffee, the culture, the cost of living, the trams, the sheer texture of the place. Sydney is the more spectacular city to visit; Melbourne is the better city to live in. Since we write travel guides for a living, we appreciate the irony.
But honestly, you should go to both. They’re 90 minutes apart by plane and about 170 years apart in temperament. Australia is large enough that you needn’t choose, even if both cities will insist that you must.
Comments